Back to Blog
Administrative Litigation and Tax Law
3/15/2026

Cancellation Lawsuit Against Unjust Disciplinary Penalties Imposed on Public Servants

Cancellation Lawsuit Against Unjust Disciplinary Penalties Imposed on Public Servants

Cancellation Action Against Unjust Disciplinary Penalties Imposed on Public Servants: What Should You Do?

Disciplinary penalties imposed on public servants directly affect their professional life, record, and financial situation. It is possible to file a cancellation lawsuit through administrative judiciary against unjust or procedurally incorrect disciplinary penalties. In this article, we summarize the relevant legislation, applicable procedures, timelines, and cost information, as well as the practical legal approach for public servants in Izmir.

Legal Basis and Fundamental Principles

  • The Civil Servants Law No. 657 regulates disciplinary offenses and penalties; especially Articles 125 (types of penalties), 126 (procedural rules), and 127 (limitations and provisions for re-sanctioning) are of importance. For detailed text, you can review the relevant law text: Law No. 657 on Civil Servants.
  • Article 129 of the Constitution states that disciplinary penalties are subject to judicial review; Article 40/2 of the Constitution mandates that judicial remedies and timelines be indicated in notifications.
  • Procedural provisions regarding administrative judicial routes are regulated under the Administrative Jurisdiction Procedure Law and Law No. 2577.
  • Decisions of the Constitutional Court influence the practices of disciplinary law; for example, the Constitutional Court has annulled certain provisions in Article 127/2 and rendered significant decisions regarding the application of time limitations for re-sanctioning. For related explanations, you can review the Constitutional Court decision: Constitutional Court decision.

Under Which Circumstances Can a Cancellation Action Be Filed?

Typical legal irregularities that can be cited for the cancellation of a disciplinary penalty include:

  • Procedural errors: Failure to carry out the investigation and decision-making procedures stipulated by law, failure to fulfill notification obligations.
  • Authority issues: Lack of authority of the body imposing the penalty.
  • Lack of cause and evidence: The administration's inability to present concrete and sufficient evidence justifying the penalty.
  • Unjust and disproportionate sanctions: The penalty imposed is disproportionate to the act.
  • Notification deficiencies: Failure to specify judicial remedies and timelines in notifications as required by Article 40/2 of the Constitution.

Step-by-Step Process and Procedure

1. Notification of the Penalty

The disciplinary penalty is notified to the civil servant in writing. The notification must clearly indicate the means of appeal and timelines. If the notification is not made or is incomplete, a legal irregularity occurs.

2. Administrative Appeal (Optional)

  • Timeline: An appeal can be made within 7 days from the date of notification.
  • Who to appeal to: For warning and reprimand, it is possible to appeal to the superior authority; for penalty reductions and suspension of increments, an appeal to the institution's disciplinary officer is provided. There is no administrative appeal route for dismission from civil service; a lawsuit can be filed directly.
  • The appeal does not suspend the execution of the penalty; however, after the appeal process, the penalty may either be finalized or annulled.

3. Filing a Cancellation Lawsuit

  • Timeline: A cancellation lawsuit must be filed with the administrative court within 60 days from the date of notification. The 60-day period continues to run even if an administrative appeal has been made.
  • Competent and authorized court: The administrative court of the location where the penalty was imposed/the administration is situated.
  • Pleading: It must be prepared considering the reasons for legal irregularity (authority, form, cause, purpose, evidence deficiency, etc.). Gathering evidence, witness statements, and expert opinions are important in the case.

4. Trial and Decision

The administrative court examines the case file and/or conducts a public hearing. When a cancellation decision is issued, the administrative action is annulled; the court may also issue a stay of execution if necessary. There are appellate and cassation remedies available against the cancellation decision (Regional Administrative Court, Council of State).

Timelines and Limitations

  • Administrative Appeal Duration: 7 days (from notification).
  • Duration for Filing a Cancellation Lawsuit: 60 days (from notification).
  • Limitation for Disciplinary Penalties (According to Article 127 of Law No. 657): 2 months for warning/reprimand; 6 months for penalty reductions/suspension of increments; 2 years for dismission from civil service (from the date of the act). The application of timelines regarding re-sanctioning has been affected by Constitutional Court decisions.
  • Missed Deadlines: If relevant administrative or judicial deadlines are missed, the right to sue is lost; meticulousness regarding timelines is essential.

Costs and Fees (Estimation Information)

The direct costs of filing a cancellation lawsuit in the administrative court vary by year. The figures below are based on projections for recent years and market data in Izmir; official fees are finalized according to the revaluation rates published in the Official Gazette.

  • Administrative lawsuit advance fee: ~1,239.40 TL for 2024; projected ~1,780 TL for 2025. An increase is expected with revaluation in 2026.
  • Petition fee: ~615.10 TL for 2024; projected ~880 TL for 2025.
  • Attorney representation fee (Estimated for Izmir): Varies between 18,000–45,000 TL based on practices between 2024-2025; varies depending on the nature of the case.
  • Litigation expenses: Estimated costs may range from 3,000–7,000 TL for expenditures such as examination, expert opinions, etc.
  • Application without an attorney: Is possible; however, it carries risks in terms of procedure and evidence.

Note: For definitive fee and charge amounts, current tables published in the Official Gazette and relevant legislation should be monitored.

What Happens After the Cancellation Lawsuit? Possible Outcomes

  • Cancellation decision: If the disciplinary penalty is found to be unlawful, the action is annulled; corrections to the record may be requested.
  • Re-processing: In the context of the Constitutional Court's precedents, time limitations and legal conditions are observed for the administration's re-sanctioning.
  • Material/moral compensation: If direct damages arise due to unjust penalties, an alternative legal path (e.g., compensation claims for job and social rights losses) may arise; these claims require separate legal evaluation.

Legal Support in Izmir: Why Professional Help is Important?

Disciplinary penalty cases are complex in technical and procedural terms. Identifying notification errors, gathering evidence, reviewing investigation documents, and accurately conveying the legal justifications in the petition require expertise. A legal team familiar with local practices in Izmir and administrative court precedents is critical for proper management of the process and preventing rights loss.

Korkmaz Law Office evaluates your case from start to finish with its administrative litigation experience and practical knowledge in disciplinary law: it verifies the legality of the administrative action, meticulously prepares necessary administrative appeals and/or cancellation lawsuits, manages evidence-gathering processes, and provides representation in court. Our aim is to protect the professional reputation of the public servant and achieve the legal outcome they deserve.

How Should You Proceed?

  • First, collect the penalty notification letter, investigation, and procedural documents in complete form.
  • To avoid missing deadlines, consider the 7-day administrative appeal and 60-day administrative lawsuit timelines from the notification date.
  • Subject the file to a legal preliminary examination; if there are procedural or evidence deficiencies, appeal with an administrative appeal or cancellation lawsuit.
  • Alternatively, having the issue evaluated by a specialized attorney prevents rights loss and provides strategic advantage.

Korkmaz Law Office conducts a detailed analysis of your case with its experience in disciplinary law and administrative litigation based in Izmir; it devises a roadmap suitable for your legal situation and carries out your defense professionally.

Disclaimer

This article is for general informational purposes and does not substitute for individual legal advice. Legal outcomes are dependent on the examination of specific files. Current legislation and fee-schedule should be checked in the Official Gazette and official legal sources. It is advisable to seek professional legal support for detailed evaluation and decision on filing a lawsuit.

Av. Hilal Korkmaz

Author

Av. Hilal Korkmaz

Avukat | İzmir Barosu

Av. Hilal Korkmaz is a graduate of the Faculty of Law at İzmir University of Economics. She has been practicing law as a registered attorney with the İzmir Bar Association since 2021. She specializes ...

View Profile

Need Legal Support on This Topic?

Contact us now for legal support.

Call Now

Initial Consultation

Get expert support for your legal issues

WhatsApp